<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Kolb Fulda&#187; Web Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/tag/engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk</link>
	<description>Web Engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to arrange a software version number</title>
		<link>http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/engineering/how-to-arrange-a-software-version-number/</link>
		<comments>http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/engineering/how-to-arrange-a-software-version-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mk_michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Version numbers defines different software versions in the development process. In a constantly software development, which takes a lot of years, it&#8217;s essential to define a fixed number which represents a release.
But what is a meaningful arrangement of such a version number? For projects developed by my own, I&#8217;m using this arrangement:


But there are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Version numbers defines different software versions in the development process. In a constantly software development, which takes a lot of years, it&#8217;s essential to define a fixed number which represents a release.</p>
<p>But what is a meaningful arrangement of such a version number? For projects developed by my own, I&#8217;m using this arrangement:<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1074" title="versionnumber" src="http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/versionnumber.jpg" alt="versionnumber" width="440" height="348" /></p>
<p><span id="more-1069"></span></p>
<p>But there are a lot more arranges you can use. Especially for bigger projects, with a couple of developers, the kind above will be insufficient. So a build number is always a good idea, like:</p>
<p><code><br />
&lt;major release&gt;.&lt;minor release&gt;.&lt;patch level&gt;-&lt;build number&gt;<br />
Example: 2.3.5-0041<br />
</code></p>
<p><strong>Major release:</strong> Very significant changes, for example a new engine or changed API&#8217;s.<br />
<strong>Minor release:</strong> New functions and features.<br />
<strong>Patch level:</strong> Fixed bugs<br />
<strong>Build:</strong> The amount of compiled versions</p>
<p>Please feel free to comment any different arrangements you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.michael-kolb.co.uk/engineering/how-to-arrange-a-software-version-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
