The company acts as a software development agency in web products. We release standard web 2.0 software dedicated to public townships. The first web software is called EstateMapper and represents specific land-use areas mapped on satellite pictures.

But what is a meaningful arrangement of such a version number? For projects developed by my own, I’m using this arrangement:

But there are a lot more arranges you can use. Especially for bigger projects, with a couple of developers, the kind above will be insufficient. So a build number is always a good idea, like:


<major release>.<minor release>.<patch level>-<build number>
Example: 2.3.5-0041


Major release: Very significant changes, for example a new engine or changed API’s.
Minor release: New functions and features.
Patch level: Fixed bugs
Build: The amount of compiled versions

Please feel free to comment any different arrangements you know.

Open the file themes/carrington-blog/comments/comments-default.php


if ($comments) {
// add this command to reorder the comments
$comments = array_reverse($comments);
$comment_count = 0;


The player is open source an can be used for free.

You can find and download the players at:
http://flash-mp3-player.net/

In the past, this function must be coded manually inside sidebar.php. I’ve already written an article about line break problems and how to integrate this function into sidebar.php. Find the aritcle here..

Now I’ve released a plugin, which gives you the opportunity to show most popular posts inside sidebar by using a widget instead of coding..

INSTALLATION:

• Be sure, CyStats Plugin is installed – 0.9.8
• Download the file, unzip it and copy to /wp-content/plugins/
• Go to plugins menue in wordpress and activate it
• Take a sidebar of your choice and configure the widget

Please comment any problems – I will try to fix it as soon as possible.

Helpful links:

• CyStats getMostVisited line breaks
• CyStats getMostVisited shows unpublished posts/

Why a cms without db could make sense, please feel free to comment some more possible reasons:

• very less changes of content
• no mysql support in hosting plan
• no skills in db administration

Below some screenshots of content management systems, which doesn’t require a database like mysql. They are using file based databases. You will find some helpful cms links at bottom of this post.

cms -db | cms-db.de
Language: php5
Features: sitemap, guestbook, shows page impressions

moziloCMS | cms.mozilo.de
Language: php >= 4.3.0
Features: special syntax, easy layout management

openEdit | www.openedit.org
Language: Java Servlet
Features: asset management, blog, calendar, search, friendly URL, LDAP

web dir X | www.webdirx.drcho.be
Language: php
Features: up to 120 pages

GuppY | www.freeguppy.org
Language: php
Features: bilingual support, guestbook, newsletter system, light version for PDA

nanoCMS | nanocms.in
Language: php
Features: multilingual, template system

 
Useful links:

• http://www.opensourcecms.com/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Content_Management_Systems

Please feel free to comment any reason, why a file based cms may be benefical.